A comparative examination of contrasted interactional activities in the main use s out of Grindr and you will Tinder
Personal Interaction , forty-two (2), 186-209. LeBaron, C., & Jones, S. E. (2002). Closing right up cl osings: Showing the fresh benefit of th e public and question surround so you’re able to the completion out-of interac tion. Journal away from Correspondence, 52 (3), 542-565. Licoppe, C. (2020). Record regarding Cultural Discount , thirteen (1), 73- 90. Licoppe, C. (2021). The latest spectre off ghosting’and the sequential organization out-of post -fits Tinder 155-276). Palgrave McMillan. Maynard, D. W., & Zimmerman, D. H. (19 84). Relevant speak, routine while the social organ ization off matchmaking. Social therapy every quarter , 47 , 301-316. midwife-lady correspondence. Suggestions Lookup, 15 (1), report 423 [Available at: tml]. Mortensen, K. K. (2017). Discourse Degree , 19 (5), 581-597. ranging from prospective romantic partners for the WeCha t conversations. Discourse Studies , 24 (5), 545-565. Schenkein (Ed.), Degree on the providers out of conver sational correspondence (pp. 79 112). Academic Pomerantz, A beneficial. (1984). Agreeing and you may disagreeing wi th assessments: Specific attributes of prominent / dispreferred change shapes. From inside the J. Meters. Atkinson & J. C. Heri tage (eds.), Formations out-of social action: Education for the conversation study (pp. 57 101). Cambridge Unive rsity Push. Pomerantz, A great. (1988). Providing an applicant respond to : An information trying strategy munication Monographs, 55 , 360 373. Raymond, G. (2003). Sentence structure and you can social organizati toward: Yes/no interrogatives and the struc ture out of reacting. American Sociological Feedback , 68 , 939 967. Continue reading